Carrying a Jurassic on me
Chapter 1924 - 908: Press Conference (Part 2)
CHAPTER 1924: CHAPTER 908: PRESS CONFERENCE (PART 2)
The sign includes pictures and text.
However, even so, not many people can understand it, so a narrator is needed.
The narrators are all students who have participated in experimental studies, at a minimum, they must understand the knowledge they are explaining. Because the audience for the explanation includes not only the reporters but also many personnel from other laboratories who have ’arrived uninvited’ after receiving the news—essentially their peers.
The reporters don’t understand much and usually ask layman’s questions. For example, Hu Yidao just heard a reporter asking whether Boss Yan’s cattle ranch would use cloning technology in the future to cultivate better beef, expressing concern over eating cloned beef in the future.
Laymen often have more imaginative ideas, which is quite normal.
There’s no need to worry at all about these types of questions; anyone with a little technical knowledge can answer them. But those uninvited members from other laboratories are harder to deal with, as their questions tend to be about practical technical aspects, involving deeper content.
Boss Yan is not afraid of leaks of technology at all. The on-site explanation can only be simple; it’s impossible to explain every step of the actual operation in detail. Narrators also choose to answer the questions that concern the public more, whereas actual technical issues are not what the public cares about—the public usually cares about practical applications, like the layman’s question earlier.
It’s like a technology exhibition where very few people want an in-depth understanding of the technology; more people are concerned about: will their phone signals be better in the future? Can they make calls in remote areas?
Simply put: many people eat eggs, but few are concerned about researching chicken breeding technologies.
Yan Fei’s requirement is to answer more questions from reporters because the questions they ask are what the public cares about. As for the peers who come to ’learn from experience,’ they can only be postponed; we can talk about it later.
Hu Yidao and his group of students envied those who were narrators. Standing beside the signs now, just like models at a car show, constantly having reporters take photos and videos.
The reporters taking photos were not the most enviable part; the key was also having leaders and peers present. Prominent figures from the provincial agriculture, forestry, and livestock technology departments participated, and even many leaders from the government attended—a technical accomplishment filling a gap is great news that adds glory to the entire province, certainly worthy of their support.
Yan Fei was entertaining these people, leading the group of big shots around while acting as a narrator.
In terms of technical level, Boss Yan is slightly above the technicians who participated in the actual experiments, being a narrator poses no problems.
Meanwhile, some of the peers, listening to the explanations, were also subtly asking the student narrators: Your understanding of this is quite deep, did you participate in the experiments?
The narrators indeed participated in the experiments. Their own laboratory has the convenience that, as long as it doesn’t affect the experiments, everyone is entirely free to observe. Sometimes, those simple repetitive experiments can allow students to try their hand in turns, creating as many opportunities as possible for everyone to step onto the experiment platform.
The difference between insiders and laymen is obvious; a few words can roughly reveal whether one is an insider or layman.
Upon hearing that narrators were experiment participants, asking further might be surprising; many are still postgraduate students, some even undergraduates.
Then the peers’ eyes immediately heated up!
They’re not fools; with just a glance around, it’s obvious that the number of narrators in the hall significantly exceeds what a normal laboratory would have in terms of technicians, even including assistants.
Some peers are still focused on technical questions, but some, after their eyes heat up, immediately bring up a very concerning question: You’re graduating soon, have your placements been determined yet?
Hu Yidao and these students’ hearts shattered upon hearing this question!
It’s easy to imagine that once you answer that your placement isn’t determined, they’ll start inviting you to their place, offering a generous list of benefits: basic issues like system positions are not even worth mentioning, it’s embarrassing to bring them up. The start of the conversation has to be about housing, otherwise it wouldn’t be fair to the hands-on experience gained in gap-filling experiments.
To know that the peers who come, are not like Yan Fei who can only offer money. System positions are basic welfare, anything distributed through system placements cannot be lacking.
Yan Fei very soon heard about this while acting as a narrator—there are quite a few ’our people’ here, and in others’ eyes, isn’t what those peers doing akin to ’blatantly poaching’?
However, Yan Fei doesn’t care: whoever wants to leave can go, joining places with system positions is good, I encourage everyone to seek better units.
A large experiment is not just about one or two people; otherwise, Yan Fei wouldn’t need to build these two separate laboratories, and could directly publish experimental results under the name of the two-person laboratory in Sancha River.
Those people may learn a bit from taking someone in some experiment or learn some theoretical knowledge. For laboratories that are a bit behind, there’s definitely some improvement, but wanting to catch up with Yan Fei’s current progress is definitely not enough—what Boss Yan is presenting now is actually lagging behind in terms of the dinosaur world, and must be done step by step.